University Sustainability Index (USI)

Sustainability Assessment

University Sustainability Index (USI)

Overview

  • This pioneering index was spearheaded by the CUHK Faculty of Social Science and executed by the Public Policy Research Centre and Centre for Business Sustainability, which evaluated the sustainability efforts of 151 higher education institutions worldwide. 

  • Building on Prof. Carlos Lo et al.’s publication (2017), the index provides a robust foundation for further research, events, and the development of an international university sustainability network.
  • The research team refined the Value–Process–Impact (VPI) framework to track institutions’ policy commitments, campus operations, community engagement, and research impacts.

 

Between 2016 and 2022, the CBS team conducted a series of preliminary assessments that culminated in the inaugural Greater China University Sustainability Index (GCUSI). This index was officially launched at the Global Conference on Sustainable Development on 4 October 2023, in collaboration with the Sustainable Development Solution Network (SGDN). In 2025, the framework will be applied to generate two additional indices: Global University Sustainability Index (GUSI) and Asia-Pacific University Sustainability Index (APUSI).

 GCUSI Launch Ceremony at the Global Conference on Sustainable Development (2023)

Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung, et al. “University social responsibility: Conceptualization and an assessment framework.” University social responsibility and quality of life: a global survey of concepts and experiences. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. 37-59.

Research Design and Methodology

Selection Criteria for Index Constituent

Global USI

Comprised 113 universities selected from the top 150 of the QS World University Rankings 2024, with inclusion contingent on the availability of USR, SDG, and sustainability data in English or Chinese..

Asia-Pacific USI

Comprised 58 universities selected from the APRU (Association of Pacific Rim Universities) – 37 universities are also included in the Global or Greater China indices, while the remaining 21 are exclusively from Pacific Rim countries (e.g., Canada, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asian nations).

Greater China USI

Comprised 30 universities identified as the highest-ranked in their respective locations according to the QS rankings, including all 8 UGC-funded institutions in Hong Kong, 10 leading universities in Mainland China, 9 in Taiwan, and 3 in Macau.

The research team refined the Value–Process–Impact (VPI) framework to track institutions’ policy commitments, campus operations, community engagement, and research impacts.

The scoring is based on the 4 aspects under the VPI model, namely Value, Process (Management & Practice) and Impact, to assess University sustainability from all angles. The respective weight is as shown.

Value: 20% Process – Management: 20% Process – Practice: 40% Impact: 20%
Total Score
20%
Value Policy commitments & institutional values
20%
Process – Management Governance & management structures
40%
Process – Practice Campus operations & community engagement
20%
Impact Research outputs & societal impact

The index universities are categorized into 6 tiers based on the scores attained, with each tier representing the level of achievement in their sustainability journey.

 

USI Score Tier
90 – 100
80 – 89
70 – 79
60 – 69
50 – 59
Below 50

Reports

Advisory Committee

Advisors

Professor Carolyn Egri

Professor Carolyn Egri

William J.A. Rowe EMBA Alumni Professor, Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University

More Info

Professor Sasha Maher

Professor Sasha Maher

Department of Management, Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School 

More Info

Professor Xue Pang

Professor Xue Pang

Faculty of Business, City University of Macau

More Info

Professor Ning Liu

Professor Ning Liu

Department of Public and International Affairs, City University of Hong Kong

More Info

Professor Chenyang He

Professor Chenyang He

HeXie Management Research Centre, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University

More info

Dr. Jingwen Mu

Dr. Jingwen Mu

Office of Institutional Research and Strategic Planning, Hong Kong Baptist University

More info

Professor Min-Fen Tu

Professor Min-Fen Tu

Department of Business Administration, Tamkang University

More info

Professor Jui-Kun Kuo

Professor Jui-Kun Kuo

Institute of Public Affairs Management, National Sun Yat-sen University

More info

Dr. Nahid Yazdani

Dr. Nahid Yazdani

Business School, University of Nottingham

More info

Professor Paulina Wong

Professor Paulina Wong

Division of Science, Lingnan University Hong Kong

More info

Voices

Dr. Nahid Yazdani, Assistant Professor in Global Business Operations, University of Nottingham

Universities have an important role not only in advancing knowledge about sustainability, but in demonstrating it through the way they teach, research, govern and operate. I see the USI as a valuable opportunity to encourage universities to reflect on this broader responsibility and, importantly, on the difference between having sustainability commitments and demonstrating meaningful outcomes. I hope the Index will continue to foster constructive dialogue and mutual learning, helping universities move from aspiration and activity towards measurable and lasting societal impact.

 

Professor Alex Wai, President and Vice-Chancellor, Hong Kong Baptist University

The Research, Education and Social Responsibility Imperative

In today’s interconnected world, universities hold a unique responsibility: to educate future generations while generating knowledge that advances academic frontiers and addresses society’s most pressing challenges. At Hong Kong Baptist University, education, research, and social responsibility are mutually reinforcing pillars of institutional excellence.

Research drives innovation, informs policy, and equips future leaders with the tools to navigate complex global issues. Yet, knowledge alone is not enough. True impact emerges when research is guided by a commitment to societal good. This is when scholarship directly contributes to health, education, sustainability, and equity. It is the essence of social responsibility: ensuring that what we discover serves communities locally, regionally, and globally.

Our case study in Chinese Medicine in Communities highlights the critical role of universities in establishing the academic foundations of a discipline that already holds deep cultural, clinical, and educational significance for our local communities. The transparency of this work and its global applications have been undertaken in the spirit of social good, global responsibility, and partnership.

Today, the culture of academic excellence we foster must also be paired with ethical responsibility, in which transdisciplinary collaborations extend beyond academia to include industry, government, and community partners, and in which every researcher understands the broader implications of their work. By aligning education and research initiatives with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, especially SDG 4 on quality education, HKBU is preparing scholars and socially conscious global citizens for our sustainably challenged world.

 

 

Dr. Jingwen Mu,  Director of Institutional Research and Strategic Planning, Hong Kong Baptist University

Participating in the first University Sustainability Index has been both affirming and instructive. The VPI framework crystallises a challenge many of us face: translating well-articulated sustainability values and robust management systems into measurable, long-term impact for our stakeholders. HKBU’s Model Achiever result is encouraging, yet the persistent gap between Practice and Impact reminds us that the real work of university social responsibility lies in sustained programmes, transparent data governance, and genuine accountability to the communities we serve. I look forward to contributing to the collective learning that the USI seeks to foster.

Case Sharing

Sharing practical and academic insights

Interested in Sharing Insight or Best Practice?

 

 

University Social Case Contribution Guideline

1. Length and Format

There isn’t any strict word limit for the Sustainability case; however, as a general reference, we’d appreciate a piece of writing of approximately 3 pages (12-point font, 1.5 spacing) fit for report format, including 6-8 relevant pictures. Kindly include references to supporting evidence / citations in footnote where applicable.

 
2. Suggested Structure

Program/Project Introduction

    • Provide background and context for the initiative

Organization and Implementation

    • Specify the organization(s) involved
    • Describe the implementation process in detail

Strategy, Objectives and Practice

    • Outline the project’s strategy and objectives.
    • Highlight actions taken, related stakeholders, and connections to our Value-Process-Impact model or international frameworks such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals

Outcomes/ Impact

    • Present the results achieved, including (better quantifiable) changes observed among stakeholders, key achievements, awards, or recognitions.

Strategic Vision for the Future

    • Share the long-term vision and aspirations for the project

Experience Sharing and Implications

    • e.g., discuss the project/ initiative’s potential for replication or implementation in other institutions
 
3. Reference Example

You may want to refer to the format and style: https://www.sdgfund.org/case-study/better-water-and-sanitation-services-through-consumer-rights-based-contract-albania

Supporting Organizations